Let's analyze the logical statements provided one by one:
Statement S1: \((p \Rightarrow q) \land (q \land (\neg q))\)
- The expression \((p \Rightarrow q)\) is logically equivalent to \((\neg p \lor q)\).
- Now consider the expression \((q \land (\neg q))\). By definition, \((q \land (\neg q))\) is a contradiction because it is impossible for a statement and its negation to both be true. Therefore, this part of the expression is always false.
- Thus, the entire expression \((p \Rightarrow q) \land (q \land (\neg q))\) simplifies to \((\neg p \lor q) \land \text{False}\), which is always false, hence it is a contradiction.
Statement S2: \((p \land q) \lor ((\neg p) \land q) \lor (p \land (\neg q)) \lor ((\neg p) \land (\neg q))\)
- This expression systematically covers all possible truth values for \(p\) and \(q\).
- Evaluate each part:
- \((p \land q)\) covers the case when both \(p\) and \(q\) are true.
- p is false and \(q\) is true.
- \((p \land (\neg q))\) covers the case when \(p\) is true and \(q\) is false.
- p and \(q\) are false.
- As each of these covers all possible truth conditions for \(p\) and \(q\), at least one part will always be true, making the whole expression a tautology.
Since both statements are logically correct as analyzed, the correct answer is that both are true.