Question:medium

Which of the following description defines a misbranded drug?

Show Hint

Legal distinctions for problematic drugs: - Label/Color faults $\implies$ Misbranded - Filth/Decomposition $\implies$ Adulterated - Imitation/Fake Identity $\implies$ Spurious
Updated On: Jul 4, 2026
  • If it has been substituted wholly or in part by another drug or substances
  • If it is not labelled in the prescribed manner
  • If it purports to be the product of a manufacturer of whom it is not truly a product
  • If it is has been prepared, packed or stored under insanitary conditions where it may be rendered injurious to health
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Concept: Under Section 17 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, legal definitions categorize substandard pharmaceutical items into three distinct legal groups to protect public health:
Misbranded Drug (Section 17): Focuses primarily on deceptive appearance, faulty labeling, coloring, or design. A drug is misbranded if it is colored, coated, powdered, or polished to conceal damage, or if its label fails to carry the required medical statements or layout details.
Adulterated Drug (Section 17A): Focuses on contamination, decomposition, or insanitary preparation environments.
Spurious Drug (Section 17B): Focuses on deliberate substitution, counterfeiting, or imitation of another brand name/manufacturer.

Step 1:
Match definitions to the corresponding options.
* Option A describes an adulterated or spurious action depending on intent. * Option B states "If it is not labelled in the prescribed manner." This matches the statutory definition of a Misbranded drug under Section 17. * Option C describes a counterfeit layout, which falls under the legal definition of a Spurious drug. * Option D describes a product manufactured under filth or unsanitary conditions, which falls under the legal definition of an Adulterated drug.
Was this answer helpful?
0