Constituency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% | |||
The following additional facts are known:
1. The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
2. None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
3. The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
What is the percentage of votes polled in total by all the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for constituency A? [This Question was asked as TITA]
Total Valid Votes:
Security Deposit Requirement:
Vote Distribution:
Remaining Votes:
Candidates Losing Security Deposit:
Percentage of Votes for Candidates Losing Deposit:
The final result for constituency A is:
Information:
Vote Distribution:
The following table summarizes the provided information:
| Constituency | Total Votes | Winner Votes | 1st Runner-Up Votes | 2nd Runner-Up Votes | 3rd Runner-Up Votes | 4th Runner-Up Votes | 5th Highest Votes | Total of Top 5 Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 500,000 | 275,000 | 95,000 | 85,000 | - | - | - | 455,000 |
| C | 600,030 | 140,006 | 130,006 | 120,006 | 110,006 | 100,006 | >100,006 | 600,030 |
| D | 100x | 15x+37,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Conclusion:
This table provides a concise overview of the vote distribution and calculations for each constituency based on the provided data.
The correct answer is option (B): 9%
| Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
| Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Firm | First year of existence | Last year of existence | Total amount raised (Rs. crores) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfloo | 2009 | 2016 | 21 |
| Bzygoo | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Czechy | 2013 | 9 | |
| Drjbna | 2011 | 2015 | 10 |
| Elavalaki | 2010 | 13 |
| Table 1: 2-day averages for Days through 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 |
| 15 | 15.5 | 16 | 17 |
| Table 2 : Ranks of participants on each day | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | |
| Akhil | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Bimal | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Chatur | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Firm | First year of existence | Last year of existence | Total amount raised (Rs. crores) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfloo | 2009 | 2016 | 21 |
| Bzygoo | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Czechy | 2013 | 9 | |
| Drjbna | 2011 | 2015 | 10 |
| Elavalaki | 2010 | 13 |