Question

Sukanta felt that the aspirational target can be achieved only if Zedius is replaced. However, he is not sure if he should make any major changes in his first year. .
Which of the following reasons will BEST help Sukanta NOT to start making major changes immediately?

• A. The owners of Zedius are respected citizens of Tivanna.
• B. TrueColor recruited Sukanta specifically to increase ticket sales by whatever means necessary.
• C. Zedius has managed TrueColor’s marketing for the last five years.
• D. Sukanta needs more time to learn about the dynamics of the eastern market.
• E. For around a decade, ticket sales have consistently hovered at 50,000.
• A. In Tivanna, the competing media agencies keep defaming each other out of fierce competition.
• B. Tivanna being a small city, a few prominent personalities have to be allowed in without tickets.
• C. Zedius is the largest media agency in Tivanna.
• D. Some attendees admitted to paying cash to gate keepers to get in.
• A. He should make Sukanta and his team to go back to Zedius immediately.
• B. He should dismiss Sukanta’s team and let the earlier media agency to take over.
• C. He should threaten Sukanta that if sales do not improve by next year, he and his team will be fired.
• D. He should engage a different media agency which is working for TrueColor’s main competitor.
• N. He should wait and watch as the investment in Sukanta may need more time to bear result.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Phase 1: Comprehend the situation.
Sukanta's objective at TrueColor is to boost ticket sales to 100,000. He is considering replacing Zedius, the established media partner, but recognizes that a hasty decision without local market knowledge would be unwise.
Phase 2: Assess each choice.
- Choice A: Zedius's owners' personal reputations are not pertinent to Sukanta's business judgment. - Choice B: The mandate to increase sales does not justify impulsive actions; strategic choices necessitate context. - Choice C: A history with TrueColor indicates stability but is insufficient justification for postponing necessary changes. - Choice D: This option presents the most sensible rationale. As a newcomer, Sukanta should first familiarize himself with the local market and competitive landscape before implementing significant alterations. - Choice E: Declining sales signal a need for action, not a reason for further delay.
Phase 3: Determine the optimal selection.
Choice D is the most appropriate because it underscores the necessity of research and evaluation prior to execution, a prudent strategy for a new manager.
Conclusive Response: \[\boxed{\text{D}}\]

Answer 2

Step 1: Situation Analysis.
Adil faces significant accusations leveled against Zedius, his long-term partner, immediately prior to a major event. The validity of these accusations is uncertain, potentially stemming from genuine issues or competitive rivalries. Adil requires justification to disregard these claims and maintain the current course of action.
Step 2: Option Evaluation.
- Option A: If the industry is characterized by frequent slander among competing agencies, these accusations can be dismissed as typical competitive strategies. This provides Adil with a valid basis to ignore the allegations. - Option B: The admission of VIPs without tickets is unrelated to the problem of illegal ticket sales. - Option C: Zedius's considerable size does not confirm its innocence; being the largest agency does not preclude the possibility of misconduct. - Option D: Proof of financial transactions with gatekeepers suggests improper conduct, necessitating an inquiry rather than dismissal.
Step 3: Optimal Justification.
Option A offers the most compelling argument for continuing with the status quo, as the accusations can be reasonably attributed to competitive defamation.
Final Answer: \[\boxed{\text{A}}\]

Answer 3

Phase 1: Context Assessment.
Adil sanctioned Sukanta's internal ticket sales strategy, deviating from Zedius. Initial results were poor, with only 40,000 tickets sold, causing internal unrest. The critical question: should Adil revoke the decision immediately or grant Sukanta an extension?
Phase 2: Option Evaluation.
- Option A: Reverting to Zedius immediately would undermine Sukanta and signal an inability to develop internal capabilities. This is premature. - Option B: Terminating Sukanta's team after a single setback would stifle innovation and severely damage morale. - Option C: Threatening Sukanta would foster fear, not accountability, and fail to build sustainable capacity. - Option D: Employing a rival's media agency introduces potential conflicts and escalates risks. - Option E: This is the optimal selection. Developing new organizational capabilities requires time for fruition. Patience and support for Sukanta provide the initiative a legitimate opportunity while preserving the long-term strategic outlook.
Phase 3: Decision Selection.
Option E harmonizes patience with strategic vision. Adil ought to oversee developments while allowing Sukanta sufficient time to improve his methodology.
Concluding Response: \[\boxed{\text{E}}\]