This passage examines codes in language and visual systems. It suggests that codes often seem inherent to a culture because they have become deeply ingrained or "naturalized." This naturalization makes the underlying coding practices invisible, leading people to view them as universal truths, thereby hiding the cultural and ideological work involved. The core idea is the distinction between genuinely natural codes and those that merely appear so through common usage and early learning, which in turn masks the coding process itself.
| Option | ExplanationNbsp; |
|---|---|
| 1 | This option wrongly claims all codes are natural, but the passage discusses some codes seeming natural due to widespread use. |
| 2 | This option mentions ideology and naturalized codes, but the passage mainly stresses how deeply integrated codes appear natural. |
| 3 | This option emphasizes early learning but misinterprets the passage's main point about certain codes appearing universal. |
| 4 | Correct. This option accurately explains how some codes, due to their widespread nature, seem natural and hide the coding process. |
Therefore, Option 4 is the best summary because it captures how linguistic and visual signs, when widely accepted, appear natural while hiding their constructed nature.