Question:medium

The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)
 

Show Hint

Look for transitions in ideas, especially when dealing with complex philosophical discussions, and identify where a concept or theme is most naturally connected.
Updated On: Jul 1, 2026
  • Option 1
  • Option 3
  • Option 4
  • Option 2
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Approach (elimination-first): Instead of hunting for the perfect home, knock out the three gaps that break something, and the survivor is the answer.

Step 1 — Kill gap (1): A good opener should set the stage, not resolve a debate. Our sentence already assumes you know the taste-vs-judgment contrast and ends on a specific scholar (Arendt) restoring a “link.” That is end-of-discussion energy, not an opening line. Eliminate (1).

Step 2 — Kill gap (2): The sentence sitting at (2) would split the historical narration. The line before (2) names Denneny’s focus; the line after (2) launches the 17th–18th-century history of the word “taste.” Dropping an Arendt/pleasure reflection between them is a jarring interruption. Eliminate (2).

Step 3 — Kill gap (3): Gap (3) sits between the history-of-meaning sentence and the “tracing the history... recover neglected thinkers” sentence. Both flanking lines are about recovery and history; inserting a dense theoretical aside about pleasure and embodiment here derails that momentum. Eliminate (3).

Step 4 — The survivor: Only $(4)$ remains, and it checks out independently: after the paragraph has built up Denneny’s historical recovery of taste, ending on the richer claim — that taste, unlike post-Kantian judgment, keeps pleasure and embodiment alive, which is what Arendt wanted back — gives a satisfying conceptual payoff.

Final answer: Position (4), i.e. Option 4.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Para Completion