The question asks why Scandium (Sc) is considered a transition element whereas Zinc (Zn) is not, and provides options related to their electronic configurations and properties.
To determine why Scandium is a transition element and Zinc is not, we should examine their electronic configurations:
- Scandium (Sc): Atomic number \(Z = 21\). The electronic configuration is \( \text{[Ar]} \, 3d^1 \, 4s^2\).
- Zinc (Zn): Atomic number \(Z = 30\). The electronic configuration is \( \text{[Ar]} \, 3d^{10} \, 4s^2\).
From these configurations, we can see:
- Scandium has a partially filled 3d orbital (\(3d^1\)), which is a characteristic of transition elements. Transition elements typically have partially filled d orbitals that allow them to form various oxidation states and often form colored compounds.
- Zinc has a completely filled 3d orbital (\(3d^{10}\)), meaning it does not typically exhibit the characteristic properties of transition metals such as multiple oxidation states (Zn mostly exhibits +2) or the formation of colored compounds.
Hence, the correct reason why Scandium is a transition metal while Zinc is not is: In case of $Sc, 3d$ orbitals are partially filled but in $Zn$ these are filled.