Step 1: Recall the limitation of an ordinary Charpy test.
A standard Charpy test just swings a pendulum into a notched bar and reports the energy absorbed, which is a useful comparative number but not a true, transferable material property because the notch is not as sharp as a real crack.
Step 2: See what pre-cracking and instrumentation each add.
Fatigue pre-cracking the specimen turns the blunt machined notch into a genuinely sharp crack, exactly what fracture mechanics theory requires. Instrumenting the striker with a load cell then lets you record the actual load versus displacement during the impact, rather than just a single lumped energy number.
Step 3: Combine both improvements to see what property results.
Together, a sharp pre-crack plus a recorded dynamic load history gives you enough information to calculate a genuine, quantitative fracture mechanics parameter under high strain rate loading, this is the dynamic fracture toughness, and it is a real transferable material property, unlike the simple impact energy from an ordinary Charpy bar.
\[ \boxed{\text{Dynamic fracture toughness}} \]