Comprehension
Power and possession have been central pursuits of modern civilization for a long time. They blocked out or distorted other features of the westernized renaissance (revival), which promised so much for humanity. What people have been and are still being taught to prize is money, success, control over the lives of others; acquisition of more and more objects.
Modern social, political and economic systems, whether capitalist, fascist or communist, reject in their working the basic principle that the free and creative unfoldment of every man, woman and child is the true measure of the worth of any society. Such unfoldment requires understanding and imagination, integrity, compassion and cooperation among people and harmony between the human species and the rest of nature.
Acquisitiveness and the pursuit of power have made modern man an aggressor against everything that is non human, an exploiter and oppressor of those who are poor, meek and unorganized. He has become a pathological type who hates and distrusts the world and suffers from both acute loneliness and false pride.
The need for a new renaissance is deeply felt by those sensitive and conscientious men and women
who not only perceive the dimensions of the crisis of our age but who also realize that only through conscious and cooperative human effort will this crisis be met and probably even overcome.
Question: 1

Which of the following statements is not true in context of the given passage?

Updated On: Jan 13, 2026
  • There is a need for a new renaissance
  • The poor and needy are oppressed by modern man
  • Modern man is not an individualist
  • Western renaissance has held a great deal of promise for mankind
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The correct answer is option (C):
Modern man is not an individualist

The question asks us to identify the statement that is *not* true based on the provided passage (which is not included in the prompt, but we can assume its implied context). The correct answer, "Modern man is not an individualist," is likely the one that contradicts the implied ideas within the passage. Here's why:

* Understanding the other options: We have other statements, "There is a need for a new renaissance," "The poor and needy are oppressed by modern man," and "Western renaissance has held a great deal of promise for mankind." The passage, depending on its arguments, could logically support or challenge these statements. A passage could argue for a new renaissance to address some problems of modern society, it could discuss the oppression of the poor, or it could assess the historical impact of the Western renaissance.
* Individualism and modern man: The core concept to focus on is "Modern man is not an individualist." Most discussions of modern society (depending on the passage's argument) often portray modern man *as* highly individualistic. Features of modern societies like emphasis on personal freedom, consumer culture, and career advancement generally highlight the importance of the individual. If the passage wants to criticize modern society, it might point out some negative results from this individual focus, which doesn't mean that modern man isn't an individualist. In other words, even if the passage dislikes the results of individualism, it would still see modern man as an individualist.
* Identifying the contradiction: The statement "Modern man is not an individualist" therefore likely contradicts the expected tone and themes that the passage would cover, based on its implied argument on modern society. The passage, even if it criticizes aspects of modern individualism, most likely won't deny that it is a central characteristic of modern times.

In essence, the prompt's answer choice directly opposes a characteristic typically associated with modern societies. The other options, however, might be consistent with the passage's arguments, even if the passage disagrees with them or finds fault with the modern world.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 2

The author hopes that the present crisis can be solved by

Updated On: Mar 20, 2026
  • Devoted individual efforts
  • Different political systems
  • Spiritual individuals
  • Purposeful and collective efforts
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The correct answer is option (D):
Purposeful and collective efforts

The correct answer, "Purposeful and collective efforts," aligns with the common understanding of how crises are resolved. Let's break down why this is the most logical choice and why the other options are less suitable.

* Purposeful and collective efforts: This is the most comprehensive and likely solution. "Purposeful" implies a clear understanding of the problem and a defined goal for solving it. "Collective efforts" suggests collaboration and cooperation among individuals or groups, recognizing that complex issues often require coordinated action. This approach emphasizes working together towards a common goal, making it the most probable solution to a crisis.

* Devoted individual efforts: While individual dedication is important, relying solely on individuals is unlikely to solve a crisis, especially a large-scale one. Crises typically require a multifaceted approach, with many different people contributing different skills and resources. Focusing solely on individual efforts overlooks the need for coordination and a shared strategy.

* Different political systems: Changing political systems, though potentially beneficial in certain contexts, is not a direct solution to a crisis. Political systems can influence the ability to respond to a crisis, but they are not, in and of themselves, a solution. A crisis often requires immediate action, whereas changing political systems is a long-term undertaking.

* Spiritual individuals: While spiritual individuals may play a role in promoting values that could contribute to resolving a crisis, this is a less direct solution. The focus on spiritual individuals is too narrow and doesn't address the broader need for a comprehensive strategy. The term "spiritual" is also open to interpretation and might not represent a universally effective approach to solve a crisis.

In conclusion, "Purposeful and collective efforts" is the most appropriate answer as it directly reflects the need for a coordinated, goal-oriented approach, which is the most likely solution to a crisis as it covers various aspects of handling the problem compared to the other answer options.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 3

The author appears to be advocating which of the following approaches to be adopted by the society?

Updated On: Jan 13, 2026
  • Capitalist
  • Communist
  • Humanistic
  • Socialist
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The correct answer is option (C):
Humanistic

To determine why "Humanistic" is the correct answer, we need to understand what humanism is and how it relates to societal approaches. Humanism, in this context, emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively. A humanistic approach to society would prioritize human well-being, dignity, and flourishing. It often focuses on things like:

* Individual Rights and Freedoms: Protecting and promoting the rights of individuals to make choices, express themselves, and pursue their goals.
* Empathy and Compassion: Encouraging understanding and care for others, especially those who are vulnerable or marginalized.
* Reason and Critical Thinking: Valuing the use of reason, evidence, and critical thinking to solve problems and improve society.
* Ethical Behavior: Promoting moral principles and ethical conduct in all aspects of life.
* Education and Self-Improvement: Supporting education and personal growth as essential for individual and societal progress.
* Focus on this-worldly concerns: Humanistic approaches tend to focus on improving life in the present, rather than prioritizing a hypothetical afterlife or other transcendental concerns.

Let's consider why the other options are less likely to be the best fit for an author's advocacy:

* Capitalist: Capitalism emphasizes free markets, private ownership, and profit. While it can lead to economic growth and individual opportunity, it doesn't necessarily prioritize human well-being above all else. Issues like income inequality, exploitation, and environmental degradation can arise.
* Communist: Communism, in its theoretical form, advocates for a classless society with collective ownership of the means of production. While it aims for equality, historical implementations have often resulted in the suppression of individual freedoms and a lack of emphasis on human dignity.
* Socialist: Socialism advocates for social ownership and control over the means of production, with the goal of creating more equitable societies. While it can address issues of inequality and provide social safety nets, socialism is a very broad term, and depending on the particular form of socialism the author might support, there can be a varying degree of emphasis on individual freedom.

Given the characteristics of humanism, it is most likely that the author is advocating for a humanistic approach. A humanistic approach aims to create a society that benefits and uplifts humanity as a whole.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 4

The modern value systems encourage the importance of which of the following?

Updated On: Jan 13, 2026
  • Craving for power and possession
  • Basic respect for all individuals
  • Spiritual development of an individual
  • Spirit of inquiry and knowledge
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The correct answer is option (A):
Craving for power and possession

The question asks about what modern value systems encourage. While the options presented touch on different aspects of values, the modern world, as it currently operates, often emphasizes the pursuit of economic success and material possessions. This aligns with a culture that values competition, achievement, and individual advancement.

Let's look at why the other options are less accurate in reflecting a *dominant* modern value system:

* Basic respect for all individuals: While respect is a value in many modern societies, it isn't always prioritized or consistently practiced. Social inequalities and biases persist, indicating that this value isn't always at the forefront.

* Spiritual development of an individual: Spiritual pursuits are common, but the overall emphasis in modern societies is more heavily placed on materialistic pursuits and societal contributions of the tangible kind rather than the intangible.

* Spirit of inquiry and knowledge: This is a value, but in the context of societal structures, it is often tied to obtaining practical knowledge useful in the job market, and therefore, tied to gaining power and possession.

Therefore, the option reflecting a focus on acquiring power and possessions is the most representative of what modern value systems, particularly those driven by capitalism and consumerism, tend to encourage.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 5

According to the passage, why has modern man turned out to be an enemy of everything that is non-human?

Updated On: Jan 13, 2026
  • He hates and distrusts other human beings
  • He has been dominated by the drives of acquisitiveness and power
  • He consciously practices the spirit of cooperation
  • He is preoccupied with his own self
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The correct answer is option (B):
He has been dominated by the drives of acquisitiveness and power

The passage states that modern man has become an enemy of the non-human world due to his relentless pursuit of acquisitiveness and power. This implies that his desires for accumulating possessions and exerting control over his environment have led him to exploit and disregard the needs and existence of other living beings. The options provided are:

Option A, "He hates and distrusts other human beings," is not directly supported by the passage as the primary reason for his animosity towards the non-human world. While humans may have their own internal conflicts, the passage focuses on a broader issue related to his relationship with nature.

Option B, "He has been dominated by the drives of acquisitiveness and power," directly aligns with the passage's explanation. The passage suggests that these powerful drives have driven modern man to act in ways that are detrimental to the non-human.

Option C, "He consciously practices the spirit of cooperation," is contrary to the idea of being an enemy. Cooperation implies working together, which is the opposite of being an antagonist to the non-human world.

Option D, "He is preoccupied with his own self," is a plausible consequence of the drives mentioned in Option B, but Option B provides the more direct and specific cause as stated in the passage. The passage emphasizes the *drives* of acquisitiveness and power as the root cause of his antagonism towards the non-human.

Therefore, the passage explains that modern man has become an enemy of everything non-human because he has been dominated by the drives of acquisitiveness and power.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension


Questions Asked in IBSAT exam