Let\( Δ,▽∈{∧,∨} \)
be such that \(p▽q⇒((pΔq)▽r) \)
is a tautology. Then \((p▽q)Δr \)
is logically equivalent to:
\((pΔr)∨q\)
\((pΔr)∧q\)
\((p∧r)Δq\)
\((p▽r)∧q\)
To solve this problem, we need to determine the logical operators \( Δ \) and \( ▽ \) such that the expression \( p ▽ q \Rightarrow ((p Δ q) ▽ r) \) is a tautology. A tautology is a statement that is true under all possible truth assignments.
Let us analyze the expression step-by-step:
Let's analyze the expression with the possible operators:
The expression becomes \( p \lor q \Rightarrow ((p \land q) \lor r) \).
The implication \( p \lor q \Rightarrow ((p \land q) \lor r) \) would be: \( \neg (p \lor q) \vee ((p \land q) \lor r) \).
Hence, the choice of operators that make the expression a tautology is \( ▽ = \lor \) and \( Δ = \land \). Under this choice, the expression \( (p \lor q) Δ r \equiv (p \land r) \lor q \), which represents \((pΔr)∨q\).
Thus, the logical equivalent expression is: (pΔr)∨q .
The number of values of $r \in\{p, q, \sim p, \sim q\}$ for which $((p \wedge q) \Rightarrow(r \vee q)) \wedge((p \wedge r) \Rightarrow q)$ is a tautology, is :
Among the statements :
\((S1)\) \((( p \vee q ) \Rightarrow r ) \Leftrightarrow( p \Rightarrow r )\)
\((S2)\)\((( p \vee q ) \Rightarrow r ) \Leftrightarrow(( p \Rightarrow r ) \vee( q \Rightarrow r ))\)