Question:medium

In which landmark case did the Supreme Court hold that the 'procedure established by law' under Article 21 must be 'fair, just, and reasonable'?

Show Hint

This judgment essentially incorporated the American concept of "Due Process of Law" into the Indian legal framework.
Updated On: Jun 5, 2026
  • Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
  • K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
  • M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
  • Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Read the question.
We need the case where the Supreme Court said the procedure under Article 21 must be fair, just, and reasonable.

Step 2: Recall the change in Article 21.
Earlier, courts read Article 21 narrowly, accepting any procedure made by law. This changed in 1978.

Step 3: Identify the case.
In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the Court ruled that any procedure that takes away life or liberty must be fair, just, and reasonable, not arbitrary.

Step 4: Eliminate the others.
Vishaka dealt with workplace sexual harassment. Puttaswamy dealt with the right to privacy. M.C. Mehta dealt with environmental matters. None set the fair procedure rule under Article 21.

Step 5: Conclude.
The landmark case is Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India.

Answer: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Constitutional Laws