In Torts, all persons who aid, or counsel, or direct or join in the committal of a wrongful act, are known as:

Question

“In India, the government can be held liable for tortious acts of its servants and can be ordered to be paid compensation to the persons suffering as a result of the legal wrong. Article 294(b) of the Constitution declares that the liability of the Union Government or the State Government may arise “out of any contract or otherwise”. The word otherwise implies that the said liability may arise for tortious acts as well. Article 300 enables the institution of appropriate proceedings against the government for enforcing such liability. … Even prior to the commencement of the Constitution, the liability of the Government for tortious acts of its servants or agents were recognised vide Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co. v. Secy. of State, (1868-69) 5 Bom HCR APP 1. After the commencement of the Constitution, there have been several cases in which the Union of India and State Governments were held liable for tortious acts of their employees, servants and agents. All those cases were not necessarily by invoking the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Though, the Government is liable for tortious acts of its officers, servants or employees, normally, such liability cannot be enforced by a Writ Court. An aggrieved party has the right to approach the competent court or authority to seek damages or compensation in accordance with the law of the land.
... But if fundamental rights have been violated, and if the court is satisfied that the grievance of the petitioner is well founded, it may grant the relief by enforcing a person’s fundamental right. Such relief may be in the form of monetary compensation/damages”.
[Extracted from: Kaushal Kishore v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 113 of 2016, decided on January 3, 2023.]

Answer 1

Step 1: Understanding the Question.
The question asks for the term used in the law of Torts to describe individuals who assist, advise, direct, or participate in the commission of a wrongful act. In tort law, liability can extend beyond the primary wrongdoer to those who contribute to the act, and the legal system provides specific terminology for such parties. The focus is on identifying the correct collective term for all such participants.
Step 2: Analysis of Options.
(a) "Abettors" refers to individuals who encourage or incite a wrongful act, but this term is narrower and does not fully encompass those who aid, direct, or join in the act, making it incomplete.
(b) "Joint tortfeasors" is the correct term, referring to two or more persons who jointly commit a tort or act in concert to cause harm. This includes those who aid, counsel, direct, or participate, and they are jointly and severally liable for the damage caused.
(c) "Tort holders" is not a recognized legal term in tort law and appears to be a misnomer or confusion with other legal concepts, rendering it incorrect.
(d) "Tort holders in common" is also not a valid term in tort law and seems to be a fabricated or misinterpreted phrase, making it incorrect.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The appropriate term for all persons who aid, counsel, direct, or join in the committal of a wrongful act in tort law is (b) Joint tortfeasors, as it comprehensively covers all forms of participation and establishes shared liability.

In Torts, all persons who aid, or counsel, or direct or join in the committal of a wrongful act, are known as:

Show Hint

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Top Questions on Law of Torts

Questions Asked in AIBE exam