Question

Highways, bridges, ethanol plants etc., are considered by the author as

• A. reasonably appropriate propositions to spend money on
• B. measures that affect the environment adversely
• C. imprudent proposals to waste money on
• D. tax saving schemes bestowed on builders
• E. None of the above

Hint:

In reading comprehension, always focus on the author's tone—whether supportive or critical.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the context provided by the options:

1. Option 1: Reasonably appropriate propositions to spend money on: This option suggests that the author believes investments in highways, bridges, ethanol plants, etc., are wise and justifiable. There is no indication from the given information that this is the author's perspective.
2. Option 2: Measures that affect the environment adversely: This option implies that the author criticizes these projects for their environmental impact. Again, there is no evidence in the given statements aligning with this interpretation.
3. Option 3: Imprudent proposals to waste money on: The term "imprudent" indicates a lack of wisdom or foresight in decisions. This choice aligns with the notion that the author views these as ineffectual expenditures and not a worthy investment.
4. Option 4: Tax saving schemes bestowed on builders: This option frames the projects as primarily financial benefits for builders rather than serving a broader public interest. There is no direct evidence in the question that supports this view.
5. Option 5: None of the above: If none of the options matched, this would be the fallback; however, one option does match as discussed.

Upon review, the most fitting interpretation is that the author characterizes these infrastructures—highways, bridges, ethanol plants—as "imprudent proposals to waste money on." This is Option 3, which reflects a critical stance on these expenditures by the author.