Question:medium

Given below sentence. A part of each sentence is underlined which may contain an error. Replace the underlined part with the right choice
Swetha has eaten few bad fish

Updated On: Nov 25, 2025
  • bad fish
  • some bad fish
  • little bad fish
  • more bad fish
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The correct answer is option (B):
some bad fish

The original sentence is "Swetha has eaten few bad fish." The underlined part is "few bad fish." We need to choose the best replacement from the given options.

Let's analyze the usage of determiners like "few" and "some."

"Few" is a quantifier that is used with countable nouns. It generally implies a small number, and often carries a negative connotation, suggesting that the number is smaller than expected or desired. For example, "few people attended the meeting" means not many people came, and this might be disappointing.

"Some" is another quantifier used with both countable and uncountable nouns. It indicates an indefinite quantity or number. When used with countable nouns, it suggests a portion or an unspecified number of items. For example, "some apples" means a few apples, an unspecified amount.

Now let's look at the options in the context of the sentence: "Swetha has eaten few bad fish."

Option 1: "bad fish"
Replacing "few bad fish" with just "bad fish" would change the meaning significantly. It would imply that Swetha ate fish, and that fish was bad, but it doesn't specify the quantity.

Option 2: "some bad fish"
This option replaces "few" with "some." "Some bad fish" means an unspecified, but likely small, number of bad fish. This makes grammatical sense and conveys a plausible meaning. It suggests that Swetha ate a certain amount of fish, and that fish happened to be bad.

Option 3: "little bad fish"
"Little" is used with uncountable nouns to indicate a small amount, such as "little water" or "little time." "Fish" can be countable (referring to individual fish) or uncountable (referring to fish as a food item). However, when referring to specific fish that have been consumed, it's more natural to treat them as countable. If we consider "fish" as uncountable here, "little bad fish" would imply a small quantity of bad fish, but the phrasing is less common and slightly awkward compared to "some bad fish." Furthermore, "little" often has a negative connotation similar to "few," implying not enough.

Option 4: "more bad fish"
This option implies a larger quantity of bad fish than some implied baseline. "Swetha has eaten more bad fish" would suggest a comparison, e.g., more than she usually does, or more than someone else. Without any context for comparison, this option doesn't fit naturally.

Considering the common usage and the intended meaning, "some bad fish" is the most appropriate replacement. The original sentence with "few bad fish" might imply that eating a small number of bad fish was somehow significant or disappointing. However, "Swetha has eaten some bad fish" is a more neutral and common way to express that she consumed a quantity of fish that was in a bad state.

Therefore, "some bad fish" is the best choice because it correctly uses a quantifier with a countable noun ("fish") to indicate an unspecified quantity and maintains a natural sentence structure.
Was this answer helpful?
0