The question involves evaluating the truth of two statements: an assertion and a reason, regarding the chemical reaction of CH_3Cl with aniline in the presence of anhydrous AlCl_3.
Assertion (A): The reaction does not give o- and p-methylaniline.
Reason (R): The -NH_2 group of aniline becomes deactivating due to salt formation with anhydrous AlCl_3 and yields m-methyl aniline as the product.
Thus, despite the fact that the assertion is true, the reason provided does not accurately explain why the expected ortho and para products aren't formed. Instead, the activation of the aniline ring is suppressed due to the coordination of the lone pair on nitrogen with AlCl_3, interfering with the Friedel-Crafts alkylation electrophile generation.
The correct answer is: (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Consider the following sequence of reactions:
The major product $P$ is:
Which of the following are aromatic?

Give plausible explanation for:
(a) Diazonium salts of aromatic amines are stable.
(b) Aniline does not undergo Friedel-Crafts reaction.
(c) Aniline on nitration gives substantial meta product.