The correct answer is option (D):
ACBD
The correct sequence for the given sentences is ACBD. Let's break down why this order creates a coherent passage and the meaning it conveys.
First, consider sentence A: "Law is based on an adversarial concept." This sentence introduces a fundamental characteristic of law, setting the stage for further discussion about its nature and implications. It establishes a starting point for understanding how legal systems operate.
Next, sentence C follows logically: "At best it results in compromise." This sentence directly elaborates on the "adversarial concept" introduced in sentence A. Adversarial systems often lead to a resolution where neither party gets everything they want, hence a compromise. It explains a common outcome of this adversarial approach.
Then, sentence B can be placed: "It provides survival, but it doesn't create synergy." This sentence builds upon the idea of compromise. While compromise can lead to a form of survival (preventing complete breakdown), it doesn't foster collaboration or mutual benefit (synergy). This distinction highlights a limitation of purely adversarial legal systems.
Finally, sentence D concludes the passage: "Certainly we need law or else society will deteriorate." This sentence provides a crucial justification for the existence of law, even with its limitations. Despite the adversarial nature and tendency towards compromise, law is presented as a necessary evil for societal stability and order. Without it, the passage implies, society would descend into chaos.
Let's examine why other options are not as effective:
B. CBAD: Starting with "At best it results in compromise" without first establishing that law is adversarial makes the compromise statement seem out of place. The idea of compromise needs a preceding context.
D. DBCA: Beginning with "Certainly we need law or else society will deteriorate" is a strong concluding statement and doesn't serve as a good starting point for introducing the nature of law.
A. BDAC: Placing "It provides survival, but it doesn't create synergy" before "At best it results in compromise" is less direct. The idea of survival and lack of synergy is a consequence or observation that flows better after acknowledging the compromise that arises from an adversarial system.
Therefore, ACBD creates a logical flow from the definition of law's adversarial nature, to its typical outcome, to its limited benefits, and finally to its essential role in society.