Step 1: Set the rule for judging strength and direction.
When the confidence intervals of two points do not touch, the change between them is a real, strong effect. When the intervals overlap a lot, the change is weak or not clearly present. Direction, positive or negative, just tells us whether abundance rises or falls from forest to crop field.
Step 2: Apply the rule to species M.
M sits near $18$ in the forest and near $3$ in the crop field, a drop of about $15$ units, and the error bars are far apart with no overlap. That is a strong, negative change.
Step 3: Apply the rule to species N.
N sits near $15$ in the forest and near $13$ in the crop field, a drop of only about $2$ units, and the error bars mostly overlap. That is a real but small drop, so this is a weak, negative change.
Step 4: Apply the rule to species O.
O sits near $2$ in the forest and near $11$ in the crop field, a rise of about $9$ units, with the error bars clearly apart. That is a strong, positive change.
Step 5: Combine and choose.
Putting the three together, M is strongly negative, N is weakly negative, O is strongly positive. This combination appears only in option (D); every other option gets at least one species wrong.
\[ \boxed{\text{M - strongly negative; N - weakly negative; O - strongly positive}} \]