Step 1: Write the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation.
The fundamental thermodynamic relation is: \[ \Delta_r G^\circ = \Delta_r H^\circ - T \Delta_r S^\circ \] Rearranging to find $\Delta_r H^\circ$: \[ \Delta_r H^\circ = \Delta_r G^\circ + T \Delta_r S^\circ \]
Step 2: List the given values.
$\Delta_r G^\circ = -128$ kJ, $T = 300$ K, $\Delta_r S^\circ = -40$ J K$^{-1}$ = $-0.040$ kJ K$^{-1}$.
Step 3: Calculate $T\Delta_r S^\circ$.
\[ T \Delta_r S^\circ = 300 \times (-0.040) = -12 \text{ kJ} \]
Step 4: Calculate $\Delta_r H^\circ$.
\[ \Delta_r H^\circ = -128 + (-12) = -140 \text{ kJ} \]
Step 5: Note the discrepancy with given answer.
The mathematical calculation gives $\Delta_r H^\circ = -140$ kJ (option 3). However, the official answer key marks option 1 = $-137.5$ kJ as correct. This appears to be an inconsistency in the question paper - possibly a printing error in the given values. Mathematically, the correct answer from the given data is $-140$ kJ.
Step 6: State the result based on calculation.
Using the standard thermodynamic relation with the provided data, the enthalpy change is $-140$ kJ. The given answer ($-137.5$ kJ) would require slightly different input values (for example, $T\Delta S = -9.5$ kJ, implying $T = 237.5$ K or $\Delta S = -31.67$ J/K).
\[ \boxed{\Delta_r H^\circ = -140 \text{ kJ (calculated); official answer: } -137.5 \text{ kJ (option 1)}} \]