| Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
| Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
To determine R1's rating for Xavier, the following data is analyzed:
Given the following:
Substituting the known values into the total sum equation:
The objective is to find \(R1_X\) (Xavier's rating). Considering the mean ratings for workers:
A combination for \(R1_V + R1_X + R1_Y = 11\) must be found where each rating is an integer between 1 and 5.
Based on this analysis, R1 assigned Xavier a rating of 3.
| Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
| Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Firm | First year of existence | Last year of existence | Total amount raised (Rs. crores) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfloo | 2009 | 2016 | 21 |
| Bzygoo | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Czechy | 2013 | 9 | |
| Drjbna | 2011 | 2015 | 10 |
| Elavalaki | 2010 | 13 |
| Table 1: 2-day averages for Days through 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 |
| 15 | 15.5 | 16 | 17 |
| Table 2 : Ranks of participants on each day | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | |
| Akhil | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Bimal | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Chatur | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Firm | First year of existence | Last year of existence | Total amount raised (Rs. crores) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfloo | 2009 | 2016 | 21 |
| Bzygoo | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Czechy | 2013 | 9 | |
| Drjbna | 2011 | 2015 | 10 |
| Elavalaki | 2010 | 13 |