Question:medium
Five restaurants, coded R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 gave integer ratings to five gig workers – Ullas, Vasu, Waman, Xavier and Yusuf, on a scale of 1 to 5. The means of the ratings given by R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 were 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8 and 3.4 respectively.
The summary statistics of these ratings for the five workers is given below. Ullas Vasu Waman Xavier Yusuf Mean rating 2.2 3.8 3.4 3.6 2.6 Median rating 2 4 4 4 3 Model rating 2 4 5 5 1 and 4 Range of rating 3 3 4 4 3
* Range of ratings is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum ratings awarded to a worker.
The following is partial information about ratings of 1 and 5 awarded by the restaurants to the workers.
(a) R1 awarded a rating of 5 to Waman, as did R2 to Xavier, R3 to Waman and Xavier, and R5 to Vasu.
(b) R1 awarded a rating of 1 to Ullas, as did R2 to Waman and Yusuf, and R3 to Yusuf.
How many individual ratings cannot be determined from the above information? [This question was asked as TITA]
Five restaurants, coded R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 gave integer ratings to five gig workers – Ullas, Vasu, Waman, Xavier and Yusuf, on a scale of 1 to 5. The means of the ratings given by R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 were 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8 and 3.4 respectively.
The summary statistics of these ratings for the five workers is given below.
* Range of ratings is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum ratings awarded to a worker.
The following is partial information about ratings of 1 and 5 awarded by the restaurants to the workers.
(a) R1 awarded a rating of 5 to Waman, as did R2 to Xavier, R3 to Waman and Xavier, and R5 to Vasu.
(b) R1 awarded a rating of 1 to Ullas, as did R2 to Waman and Yusuf, and R3 to Yusuf.
How many individual ratings cannot be determined from the above information? [This question was asked as TITA]
The summary statistics of these ratings for the five workers is given below.
| Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
| Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
The following is partial information about ratings of 1 and 5 awarded by the restaurants to the workers.
(a) R1 awarded a rating of 5 to Waman, as did R2 to Xavier, R3 to Waman and Xavier, and R5 to Vasu.
(b) R1 awarded a rating of 1 to Ullas, as did R2 to Waman and Yusuf, and R3 to Yusuf.
How many individual ratings cannot be determined from the above information? [This question was asked as TITA]
Updated On: Nov 25, 2025
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
Hide Solution
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
The objective is to ascertain if all individual ratings can be definitively established given the mean ratings of restaurants and workers, alongside a few specified ratings.
Step 1: Total ratings per restaurant
Each restaurant provided ratings for 5 workers, resulting in 5 ratings per restaurant.
Step 2: Total sum of ratings for each restaurant
- R1: Mean = 3.4 → Total Sum = \( 3.4 \times 5 = 17 \)
- R2: Mean = 2.2 → Total Sum = \( 2.2 \times 5 = 11 \)
- R3: Mean = 3.8 → Total Sum = \( 3.8 \times 5 = 19 \)
- R4: Mean = 2.8 → Total Sum = \( 2.8 \times 5 = 14 \)
- R5: Mean = 3.4 → Total Sum = \( 3.4 \times 5 = 17 \)
Step 3: Incorporating known ratings
- R1 rated Waman 5 → Remaining sum for R1 = \( 17 - 5 = 12 \)
- R2 rated Xavier 5, Waman 1, Yusuf 1 → Remaining sum for R2 = \( 11 - 7 = 4 \)
- R3 rated Waman 5, Xavier 5, Yusuf 1 → Remaining sum for R3 = \( 19 - 11 = 8 \)
- R5 rated Vasu 5 → Remaining sum for R5 = \( 17 - 5 = 12 \)
Step 4: Worker ratings analysis
| Worker | Known Ratings | Mean |
|---|---|---|
| Ullas | 1 (from R1), ?, ?, ?, ? | 2.2 |
| Vasu | ?, ?, ?, ?, 5 (from R5) | 3.8 |
| Waman | 5 (from R1), 1 (from R2), 5 (from R3), ?, ? | 3.4 |
| Xavier | ?, 5 (from R2), 5 (from R3), ?, ? | 3.6 |
| Yusuf | ?, 1 (from R2), 1 (from R3), ?, ? | 2.6 |
Step 5: Uniqueness of determined ratings
Yes, all ratings can be uniquely determined because:
- The total ratings for each restaurant are fixed.
- The mean ratings for each worker establish equations for the sum of their ratings.
- Sufficient known ratings exist to resolve the system of equations definitively.
Final Answer: \( \boxed{0} \) ratings remain undetermined.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Top Questions on Table
- Four reviewers (R1, R2, R3, R4) are in charge of reviewing products from companies A, B, C, and D. Each reviewer provides a rating between 1 and 5 for the products. Due to a technical glitch, the original ratings were deleted, and only the averages calculated for each product (A, B, C, D) and each reviewer (R1, R2, R3, R4) were saved. The data available is as follows:Tasks:
A B C D Average 3 4 4 ? 4 3 ? 5 ? 4 ? 3 3 ? 4 ? ? ? ? 4.25 4 4 4 4.25
1. What are the missing values in the table?
2. How were the missing values calculated?
3.Verify the correctness of the given averages for both rows and columns. - Out of 10 countries -- Country 1 through Country 10 -- Country 9 has the highest gross domestic product (GDP), and Country 10 has the highest GDP per capita. GDP per capita is the GDP of a country divided by its population. The table below provides the following data about Country 1 through Country 8 for the year 2024.
Column 1 gives the country's identity.
Column 2 gives the country's GDP as a fraction of the GDP of Country 9.
Column 3 gives the country's GDP per capita as a fraction of the GDP per capita of Country 10.
Column 4 gives the country's annual GDP growth rate.
Column 5 gives the country's annual population growth rate.
Assume that the GDP growth rates and population growth rates of the countries will remain constant for the next three years. - The table given below shows the amount, in grams, of carbohydrate, protein, fat and all other nutrients, per 100 grams of nutrients in seven foodgrains. The first column shows the foodgrain category and the second column its codename. The table has some missing values.
The following additional facts are known.
1. Both the pseudo-cereals had higher amounts of carbohydrate as well as higher amounts of protein than any millet.
2. Both the cereals had higher amounts of carbohydrate than any pseudo-cereal.
3. All the missing values of carbohydrate amounts (in grams) for all the foodgrains are non zero multiples of 5.
4. All the missing values of protein, fat and other nutrients amounts (in grams) for all the foodgrains are non-zero multiples of 4.
5. P1 contained double the amount of protein that M3 contains. - Five restaurants, coded R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 gave integer ratings to five gig workers – Ullas, Vasu, Waman, Xavier and Yusuf, on a scale of 1 to 5. The means of the ratings given by R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 were 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8 and 3.4 respectively.
The summary statistics of these ratings for the five workers is given below.* Range of ratings is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum ratings awarded to a worker.Ullas Vasu Waman Xavier Yusuf Mean rating 2.2 3.8 3.4 3.6 2.6 Median rating 2 4 4 4 3 Model rating 2 4 5 5 1 and 4 Range of rating 3 3 4 4 3
The following is partial information about ratings of 1 and 5 awarded by the restaurants to the workers.
(a) R1 awarded a rating of 5 to Waman, as did R2 to Xavier, R3 to Waman and Xavier, and R5 to Vasu.
(b) R1 awarded a rating of 1 to Ullas, as did R2 to Waman and Yusuf, and R3 to Yusuf.
What is the median of the ratings given by R3 to the five workers?[This question was asked as TITA] - Want to practice more? Try solving extra ecology questions todayView All Questions