The correct answer is option (E):
RSPQ
The correct answer is RSPQ. This is because the sentence fragments, when arranged in this order, create the most logical and coherent passage. Let's break down the reasoning:
* **R: If some species cannot survive in their current habitat:** This acts as the introductory clause, setting the condition or reason. It begins by establishing the "if" scenario, which is crucial for the overall context.
* **S: Due to global warming or human proximity:** This clause explains the reason *why* some species might not survive in their current habitat. It provides the causative factors for the condition introduced in R. It logically follows from the condition of not being able to survive.
* **P: We should definitely move them:** This clause introduces the suggested solution or action based on the stated problem. The "them" refers to the species mentioned earlier. This clause follows logically after the reason is given for them not surviving.
* **Q: To cooler climes and safer environments:** This clause completes the action introduced in P. It describes where the species should be moved to, giving the purpose and direction of the move. It logically completes the action mentioned in P.
Therefore, the order RSPQ creates a complete and coherent sentence that makes logical sense: "If some species cannot survive in their current habitat due to global warming or human proximity, we should definitely move them to cooler climes and safer environments."