Question

Directions for Summary: A paragraph is followed by four options which have summarized the passage in their own way. Pick the option that best summarizes the passage:
Foreign peacekeepers often exist in a bubble in the poor countries in which they are deployed; they live in posh compounds, drive fancy vehicles, and distance themselves from locals. This may be partially justified as they are outsiders, living in constant fear, performing a job that is emotionally draining. But they are often despised by the locals, and many would like them to leave. A better solution would be bottom-up peacebuilding, which would involve their spending more time working with communities, understanding their grievances and earning their trust, rather than only meeting government officials.

• A. The environment in poor countries has tended to make foreign peacekeeping forces live in enclaves, but it is time to change this scenario.
• B. Extravagant lifestyles and an aloof attitude among the foreigners working as peacekeepers in poor countries have justifiably make them the target of local anger.
• C. Peacekeeping forces in foreign countries have tended to be aloof for valid reasons but would be more effective if they worked more closely with local communities.
• D. Peacekeeping duties would be more effectively performed by local residents given their better understanding, knowledge and rapport with their own communities.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

The text examines the conduct and influence of international peacekeepers in impoverished nations. These peacekeepers maintain separation from the local populations, frequently residing in superior accommodations, thereby establishing a division from the communities they are meant to assist. While their segregation may be defensible due to the demands of their duties, it engenders animosity from residents. The passage advocates for an alternative strategy of grassroots peacebuilding, wherein peacekeepers interact directly with local communities to comprehend their challenges and foster confidence.

Considering the presented choices:

1. The initial option accurately portrays the existing scenario but omits discussion of the proposed solution for enhanced collaboration with local populations.

2. The second option emphasizes the resentment stemming from the peacekeepers' lifestyle but fails to underscore the prospective advantages of close community engagement.

3. The third option accurately encapsulates the passage, acknowledging that despite potential justifications for the peacekeepers' detachment, improved results would materialize through direct interaction with local communities.

4. The fourth option proposes substituting foreign peacekeepers with local inhabitants, which diverges from the passage's recommendation of peacekeepers collaborating closely with, rather than replacing, locals.

Consequently, the most fitting summary of the passage is the third option: Peacekeeping forces in foreign countries have tended to be aloof for valid reasons but would be more effective if they worked more closely with local communities.