Picture explaining this paragraph to a friend in one breath: you would not say "memory sometimes changes," you would say "memory is built to change, because it is rebuilding the past to fit what you need right now, not photographing it." That single sentence already contains everything the paragraph cares about — the mechanism (reconstruction driven by expectations, emotion, and present needs) and the payoff (why eyewitnesses get it wrong and personal stories drift). A summary that reduces this to "people forget things" or "eyewitnesses are unreliable" throws away the mechanism and keeps only a symptom, and a summary claiming memory is a faithful record flatly contradicts the opening line. The option that keeps both the mechanism and the payoff is the one that actually captures the central idea.