Step 1: Restate the parts.
Assertion: genetic material should be stable and not change with life stage, age, or physiology. Reason: this stability is shown by the transforming principle.
Step 2: Judge the assertion.
A is correct. For information to pass safely from parent to offspring and within a body, the genetic material must stay stable.
Step 3: Judge the reason.
R is also correct. Griffith's transforming principle, later shown to be DNA, kept passing on the same trait, proving the genetic material is stable.
Step 4: Do they connect.
Both are true, but the reason talks about evidence from one experiment. The assertion is about why stability is needed across life. So R supports the idea but does not directly explain the assertion.
Step 5: Pick the matching option.
Both A and R correct, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
Step 6: Conclusion.
Therefore the correct answer is "Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not correct explanation for (A)". \[ \boxed{\text{A and R true, R not the explanation}} \]