Let's redo this calculation by converting everything to SI units from the very first step and cross-checking the angle with its radian value, so we can also see how close the tangent and radian values are for a small angle.
- Convert the geometry to SI units first: the square has a side of $1$ cm $= 0.01$ m, so its area is $A = (0.01\,\text{m})^2 = 1\times10^{-4}\,\text{m}^2$.
- Compute stress: $\tau = F/A = 0.01\,\text{N} / (1\times10^{-4}\,\text{m}^2) = 100\,\text{Pa}$.
- Convert the angle to radians as a cross-check: $\theta = 5^{\circ} \times \pi/180 \approx 0.0873$ rad. Compare this to $\tan(5^{\circ}) \approx 0.0875$: the two are very close, since $5^{\circ}$ is small enough that $\tan\theta \approx \theta$ (in radians) is a good approximation.
- Use the strict definition of shear strain, $\gamma = \tan\theta$, since the figure defines $\theta$ as the actual geometric tilt angle of the originally vertical face: $\gamma = \tan(5^{\circ}) = 0.0875$.
- Solve for $G$ from Hooke's law in shear: $G = \tau/\gamma = 100/0.0875 \approx 1143\,\text{Pa}$.
- Express the result in kilopascals: $1143\,\text{Pa} \times (1\,\text{kPa}/1000\,\text{Pa}) \approx 1.14\,\text{kPa}$.
Since $5^{\circ}$ is a small angle, using $\theta$ in radians instead of $\tan\theta$ would give $G \approx 100/0.0873 \approx 1146\,\text{Pa} \approx 1.15\,\text{kPa}$, which rounds to essentially the same value among the given choices. This confirms the result does not depend much on which small-angle form we use here.
Let's summarize:
- Stress is force over the loaded area, here $100$ Pa.
- Strain is the tangent of the shear angle, here about $0.0875$.
- Dividing gives a shear modulus of about $1.14$ kPa.
So the shear modulus of the tissue is about $1.14$ kPa, which is option (A).