Question:hard

A TED talk (the acronym stands for Technology, Entertainment, and Design) is one of the routes to academic stardom that didn't exist a decade ago. (The 30th anniversary celebration aside, curators only began posting fame-making free online videos in 2006.) Although TED plays an inordinate role in setting the tone for how ideas are conveyed, not only because of the reach of its videos but also through spinoffs like regional "TEDx" events and the TED Radio Hour, one of the few places nonpolicy intellectuals get substantial on-air time, it's just one of a number of platforms that are changing the ecology of academic celebrity. These include similar ideas-in-nuggets conclaves, such as the Aspen Ideas Festival and PopTech, along with huge online courses and, yes, still, blogs. These new, or at least newish, forms are upending traditional hierarchies of academic visibility and helping to change which ideas gain purchase in the public discourse.

In a famous essay, "The Unbearable Ugliness of Volvos," first published in the early 90s, the literary scholar Stanley Fish wrote that "the flourishing of the lecture circuit has brought with it new sources of extra income ... [and] an ever-growing list of stages on which to showcase one's talents, and geometric increase in the availability of the commodities for which academics yearn, attention, applause, fame, and ultimately, adulation of a kind usually reserved for the icons of popular culture." Fish was Exhibit A among professors taking advantage of such trends, and his trailblazing as a lit-crit celebrity inspired the dapper, globe-trotting lit-theory operator Morris Zapp, a character in David Lodge's academic satire Small World. But the world Fish was describing, where no one could live-tweet the lectures, let alone post the talks for worldwide distribution, now seems sepia-toned. "If David Lodge's Morris Zapp were alive and kicking today," observes John Holbo, an associate professor of philosophy at the National University of Singapore, and blogger at Crooked Timber and the Valve, "he'd be giving a TED talk, not an MLA talk. Which is to say: He wouldn't be doing Theory. He probably wouldn't be in an English department."

Q73. Which of the following cannot be inferred from the passage?

Show Hint

Find the one option the passage's own words actually work against.
Updated On: Jul 16, 2026
  • TED is the future
  • Theory can no longer be counted on
  • Philosophy is best understood through demos
  • TED is irreplaceable
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

A faster way to handle this kind of question is to first mark the sentence in the passage that each option is trying to test, then check whether that sentence supports or denies the option.

For option A, the anchor is TED plays an inordinate role in setting the tone for how ideas are conveyed, which supports TED shaping the future of academic communication.

For option B, the anchor is the Holbo quote saying a modern Fish figure wouldn't be doing Theory, which supports Theory losing ground.

For option C, the anchor is that Holbo, a philosophy professor, is the one pointing out that ideas now spread through talks rather than papers, which loosely supports the idea of philosophy reaching people through demonstrations.

For option D, the anchor is the sentence describing TED as just one of a number of platforms that are changing the ecology of academic celebrity, alongside the Aspen Ideas Festival, PopTech, online courses and blogs. This sentence does the opposite of supporting irreplaceability, it tells you TED has direct substitutes.

Since three options have a supporting anchor in the text and one option is contradicted by its anchor, the answer has to be the contradicted one.

The correct answer is option D, TED is irreplaceable.

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension


Questions Asked in SNAP exam