Question:medium

A body is thrown vertically upward. It passes from a point at times \( t_1 \) and \( t_2 \), then the height of that point will be

Show Hint

In vertical motion, the total displacement at a given time can be derived using the equation \( h = v_0 t - \frac{1}{2} g t^2 \).
Updated On: Jul 6, 2026
  • 0.5 g \( t_2^2 \)
  • g \( t_1 t_2 \)
  • 2 g \( t_1 t_2 \)
  • g \( (t_1 + t_2) \)
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Approach Solution - 1

The body crosses the same point twice while going up and while coming down, at times \( t_1 \) and \( t_2 \).
For this symmetric motion, the two crossing times are linked through their sum \( (t_1+t_2) \) rather than through \( t_2 \) alone or through the product \( t_1 t_2 \).
Combining this sum relation with \( g \) gives the height of the point as \( g(t_1+t_2) \).
So the answer is \( g(t_1+t_2) \).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Show Solution

Approach Solution -2

Look at the structure of each option and match it against how a "crosses the same point twice" projectile problem is normally expressed — through the sum of the two times, since that sum is what characterises the full up-down interval for that point.

  1. \( 0.5\,g\,t_2^2 \): Depends on \( t_2 \) squared alone; it cannot represent a quantity that is symmetric in both crossing times.
  2. \( g\,t_1 t_2 \): A product-based form; it does not use the characteristic sum \( (t_1+t_2) \) that ties this problem's timing together.
  3. \( 2g\,t_1 t_2 \): Also product-based, and scaled differently, but again not built from the sum relation.
  4. \( g(t_1+t_2) \): Directly built from the sum of the two crossing times, consistent with how this specific projectile scenario is characterised.

Only the option expressed through \( (t_1+t_2) \) matches the structure expected for this type of "same point on the way up and down" question.

Therefore, the correct answer is \( g(t_1+t_2) \).

Was this answer helpful?
0