Question:medium
A 16-year-old girl and a 23-year-old man are medically examined after the girl's parents accuse the man of rape. The girl reports that the sexual activity was consensual, and no physical injuries are noted. According to law, which statement is correct?
A 16-year-old girl and a 23-year-old man are medically examined after the girl's parents accuse the man of rape. The girl reports that the sexual activity was consensual, and no physical injuries are noted. According to law, which statement is correct?
Show Hint
Under POCSO, all persons below 18 years are children, and their consent for sexual activity is not legally valid.
Updated On: May 14, 2026
- Consent is invalid as the girl is under 18 years
- No punishment since the act was consensual
- Parents must prove that the act was non-consensual
- No punishment since there are no injuries
Show Solution
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Question:
This question tests knowledge regarding the legal age of consent for sexual activity in India under current legislation.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
POCSO Act (2012): The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act is the primary law in India governing crimes against minors. A "child" is defined by this act as anyone under the age of 18 years.
Legal Age of Consent: In India, the age of consent is 18 years. This applies to both the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code (Section 375/376). Any sexual act with a person under 18 is legally considered a sexual offence, regardless of whether the minor "consented" to the act.
Invalidity of Consent: The law presumes that a person under 18 lacks the legal capacity to give informed consent for sexual activity. Therefore, the "consent" given by the 16-year-old girl is legally void and irrelevant to the criminal proceedings.
Physical Injuries: The absence of physical injuries or signs of struggle does not exonerate the accused. The crime is established by the minor's age and the act itself (Statutory Rape).
Burden of Proof: In POCSO cases, the burden of proof often shifts to the accused to prove their innocence once the basic facts of the act and age are established.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Because the girl is 16 years old, any "consent" she provided is invalid under Indian law, which sets the age of consent at 18.
This question tests knowledge regarding the legal age of consent for sexual activity in India under current legislation.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
POCSO Act (2012): The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act is the primary law in India governing crimes against minors. A "child" is defined by this act as anyone under the age of 18 years.
Legal Age of Consent: In India, the age of consent is 18 years. This applies to both the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code (Section 375/376). Any sexual act with a person under 18 is legally considered a sexual offence, regardless of whether the minor "consented" to the act.
Invalidity of Consent: The law presumes that a person under 18 lacks the legal capacity to give informed consent for sexual activity. Therefore, the "consent" given by the 16-year-old girl is legally void and irrelevant to the criminal proceedings.
Physical Injuries: The absence of physical injuries or signs of struggle does not exonerate the accused. The crime is established by the minor's age and the act itself (Statutory Rape).
Burden of Proof: In POCSO cases, the burden of proof often shifts to the accused to prove their innocence once the basic facts of the act and age are established.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Because the girl is 16 years old, any "consent" she provided is invalid under Indian law, which sets the age of consent at 18.
Was this answer helpful?
0
