Why was the boy in the story ill treated?

Question

Match List-I with List-II \[ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Concept} & \textbf{Characteristic} \\ \hline (A) \; \text{Nuclear Family} & (I) \; \text{Husbands are Brothers} \\ \hline (B) \; \text{Matrilineal Descent} & (II) \; \text{Mates and their Children} \\ \hline (C) \; \text{Fraternal Polyandry} & (III) \; \text{Married couple and their married children} \\ \hline (D) \; \text{Extended Family} & (IV) \; \text{Children belong to the kin group of mothers} \\ \hline \end{array} \] Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Answer 1

Step 1: Spot the direct statement.
In this kind of reading question, look for the sentence that explains the treatment. The author quotes the villagers' own words to explain it.

Step 2: Read what those words were.
The words say that he is a bachelor. This is the whole explanation offered in the text.

Step 3: Rule out the others.
Widower, orphan and a hated family member are all details that the passage does not contain. Choosing any of them would mean inventing facts.

Step 4: Link to the subject.
In the societies described, wives bring food gathered by women, so an unmarried man is at a disadvantage. This fits the economic role of marriage.

Step 5: Conclude.
Option 1 is the only choice supported by the text.

Final Answer:
Option 1, because he was a bachelor. \[\boxed{\text{Option 1}}\]

Why was the boy in the story ill treated?

Show Hint

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Top Questions on Family: Definition, forms and types

Questions Asked in CUET (UG) exam