Conservation biologists have a fairly specific list of reasons why small populations are especially fragile, and this question is testing whether you can tell those genuine small-population risks apart from general ecological interactions or from a factor that actually reduces risk. Let's take the options one at a time.
Only inbreeding depression and demographic stochasticity are recognised mechanisms that specifically threaten small populations more than large ones.
Let's summarize:
So the correct options are (A) and (B).
