Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The vector equation of a line generates the position vectors of all points on that line by varying the parameter \( \lambda \). To check if a given point lies on the line, we need to see if there exists a single value of \( \lambda \) that produces the coordinates of that point.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Any point \( (x, y, z) \) on the line can be represented as:
\[ x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k} = (13\hat{i} - 14\hat{j} + 23\hat{k}) + \lambda(5\hat{i} - 7\hat{j} - 9\hat{k}) \]
This gives us three parametric equations by equating the components:
\[ x = 13 + 5\lambda \]
\[ y = -14 - 7\lambda \]
\[ z = 23 - 9\lambda \]
We will test each option by trying to solve for a consistent value of \( \lambda \).
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Let's test option (D): The point (23, -28, 5).
Substitute these coordinates into the parametric equations.
For x = 23:
\[ 23 = 13 + 5\lambda \]
\[ 10 = 5\lambda \implies \lambda = 2 \]
For y = -28:
\[ -28 = -14 - 7\lambda \]
\[ -14 = -7\lambda \implies \lambda = 2 \]
For z = 5:
\[ 5 = 23 - 9\lambda \]
\[ -18 = -9\lambda \implies \lambda = 2 \]
Since we found the same value of \( \lambda = 2 \) for all three coordinates, the point (23, -28, 5) lies on the given line.
Let's quickly check another option to see why it fails, for example, option (C): (23, -28, 7).
From the x and y coordinates, we already know we need \( \lambda=2 \). Let's check if this works for z=7.
\[ z = 23 - 9\lambda = 23 - 9(2) = 23 - 18 = 5 \]
This gives z=5, but the point in option (C) has z=7. Since \( 5 \neq 7 \), the point (23, -28, 7) does not lie on the line.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The point (23, -28, 5) is on the straight line.