\((\sim q \land p) \land q\)
\((\sim q \land p) \land (p \land \sim p)\)
\((\sim q \land p) \lor (p \lor \sim p)\)
\((p \land q) \land (\sim (p \land q)\)
To determine which statement is a tautology, we need to analyze each given option and identify the logical structure that is always true, irrespective of the truth values of the individual propositions.
Let's evaluate each option:
This expression can never be a tautology because if q is true, then \sim q is false, which makes (\sim q \land p) false, leading to the entire conjunction being false.
Notice that (p \land \sim p) is a contradiction since a proposition p cannot be both true and false at the same time. Therefore, the whole statement is a contradiction, not a tautology.
The sub-expression (p \lor \sim p) is a tautology because any proposition p is either true or false (law of excluded middle). Therefore, the entire expression evaluates to true regardless of the truth value of p or q, making it a tautology.
This expression is a direct contradiction because (p \land q) cannot simultaneously be true and false. Thus, it cannot be a tautology.
Upon this analysis, only option three (\sim q \land p) \lor (p \lor \sim p) results in a tautology because of the presence of the component (p \lor \sim p), which is always true according to the law of excluded middle.
The system of equations
–kx + 3y – 14z = 25
–15x + 4y – kz = 3
–4x + y + 3z = 4
is consistent for all k in the set
The sum of all the elements of the set {α ∈ {1, 2, …, 100} : HCF(α, 24) = 1} is