Step 1: What information comes from transient (infinite-acting) data?
During a well test, the transient or infinite-acting radial flow period is mainly used to calculate formation properties. From this region:
Therefore, both $k$ and $s$ are evaluated using transient-state data, not pseudo-steady-state data.
Step 2: What information comes from pseudo-steady-state (boundary-dominated) flow?
When the pressure response reaches the boundary-dominated or pseudo-steady-state flow regime, the effect of reservoir limits becomes visible. This late-time behavior mainly reflects:
Hence, reservoir geometry is typically interpreted from pseudo-steady-state data, making option (C) correct.
Step 3: Understanding Absolute Open Flow Potential (AOFP).
For gas wells, back-pressure (deliverability) tests are conducted to establish the deliverability relationship. By extrapolating the flow equation to $p_{wf} \to 0$, the Absolute Open Flow Potential (AOFP) is obtained. Thus, statement (D) is also correct.
Step 4: Checking each option.
(A) Incorrect: Permeability and skin are not mainly calculated from pseudo-steady-state data.
(B) Incorrect: Reservoir geometry is not normally determined from early transient data unless boundaries appear.
(C) Correct.
(D) Correct.
Step 5: Final conclusion.
The correct answers are:
\[ \boxed{(C)\ \text{and}\ (D)} \]