Step 1: Identify the agent in the picture.
The image depicts EMLA, the Eutectic Mixture of Local Anaesthetics, a topical cream applied to intact skin before venepuncture, minor procedures and paediatric injections.
Step 2: Recall its true composition.
EMLA is a 1:1 eutectic blend of two amide local anaesthetics: lignocaine (lidocaine) 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%. It does NOT contain ropivacaine, and it is not 5% lignocaine alone. So any option claiming ropivacaine or 5% lignocaine is built on a wrong formula.
Step 3: Recall its kinetics.
Because the cream must diffuse through the stratum corneum, onset is slow. Adequate dermal anaesthesia needs roughly 45-60 minutes of contact under an occlusive dressing, so the claim that it acts within 15 minutes is also false.
Step 4: Find the one correct statement via the prilocaine link.
The prilocaine component is metabolised to o-toluidine, an oxidant that converts the ferrous iron of haemoglobin to the ferric form. This produces methaemoglobin, which cannot carry oxygen $-$ i.e. methaemoglobinaemia. This is the recognised serious adverse effect of EMLA, especially in neonates and infants.
Step 5: Conclusion.
Eliminating the three false statements (wrong drugs, wrong strength, wrong onset) leaves the prilocaine-driven oxidant injury as the only true statement: EMLA can lead to (met)haemoglobinaemia.
Final answer: Option 2 - EMLA can lead to hemoglobinemia.