Minimal change disease gets its name because the glomeruli look almost normal under a light microscope, yet the patient still has heavy proteinuria. The real damage only shows up on electron microscopy.
- Loss of foot processes: True but incomplete on its own, since it does not explain why protein specifically leaks out.
- Antigen-antibody complexes: Wrong for MCD. Immunofluorescence is negative here; immune complex deposits belong to diseases like membranous nephropathy.
- Loss of foot processes along with loss of charge across the membrane, causing proteinuria: This is the complete and correct mechanism. Podocyte foot process effacement plus loss of the membrane's anionic (negative charge) barrier lets albumin cross into the urine.
- Destruction of the glomerulus, with minimal tissue remaining: This describes severe glomerular scarring, not MCD, where the glomerulus stays structurally intact.
Put simply, MCD proteinuria comes from a double hit: the podocyte's foot processes flatten out, and the membrane loses the negative charge that normally repels albumin.
Let's summarize:
- Light microscopy is normal in MCD; the lesion is seen only on electron microscopy.
- Foot process loss plus charge barrier loss together explain the selective proteinuria.
The correct statement is option (C): loss of foot processes with loss of membrane charge, leading to proteinuria.