To solve this problem, we need to use Malus's Law, which states that when unpolarized light passes through a polaroid, the intensity of the light is halved. When light passes through subsequent polaroids, the intensity can be described by \(I = I_0 \cos^2 \theta\), where \(I_0\) is the initial intensity, and \(\theta\) is the angle between the light’s polarization direction and the polaroid’s pass axis. Given:
- Initial intensity: \(I_0 = 32 \, \text{Wm}^{-2}\)
- Intensity after first polaroid: \(I_1 = \frac{I_0}{2} = 16 \, \text{Wm}^{-2}\)
Next, let \(\theta\) be the angle between the pass axes of the first and second polaroids. Using Malus's Law:
\(I_2 = I_1 \cos^2 \theta\)
- \(I_2 = 16 \cos^2 \theta\)
The emergent light intensity \(I_3\) from the third polaroid with pass axis perpendicular to the first can be described as follows, since the angle between the second and third polaroid pass axes is \(90^\circ - \theta\):
\(I_3 = I_2 \cos^2 (90^\circ - \theta)\)
- \(I_3 = 16 \cos^2 \theta \sin^2 \theta\)
We're given \(I_3 = 3 \, \text{Wm}^{-2}\). Therefore:
\(16 \cos^2 \theta \sin^2 \theta = 3\)
\(16 \times \frac{1}{4} \sin^2 2\theta = 3\)
\(\sin^2 2\theta = \frac{3}{4}\)
\(\sin 2\theta = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4}} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\)
\(2\theta = 60^\circ\)
\(\theta = 30^\circ\)
The angle \(\theta\) between the first two polaroids is \(30^\circ\), which lies within the expected range of \(30,30\).