Step 1: Understand the offence.
Section 362 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 explains the word Abduction. It happens when one person makes another person move from one place to another. The question asks which listed thing is NOT a needed ingredient.
Step 2: Read the exact words of Section 362.
The section says abduction is when, by force or by any deceitful means, a person is compelled or induced to go from any place. So two clear ingredients are force or deceit, and moving the person from one place to another.
Step 3: Check options A and B.
Option A talks about using physical force or deceitful means, and option B talks about making the person move from one place to another. Both of these are written right into the section, so both are real ingredients.
Step 4: Think about age.
Abduction can be done against any person, whether an adult or a child. The section does not say the victim must be a minor. Age matters for kidnapping (Section 361), not for abduction. So saying the person must be a minor is wrong for Section 362.
Step 5: Check the continuing offence point.
Courts treat abduction as a continuing offence because the wrong keeps going as long as the abductor keeps control over the person. So option D fits the idea of abduction and is not the odd one out.
Step 6: State the answer.
Since age is not required at all for abduction, the requirement that the person must be a minor is the thing that does NOT belong. \[ \boxed{\text{The person abducted must be a minor}} \]