Comparing ethyl silicate and sodium silicate on cost and quality grounds explains why foundries use both rather than picking just one.
- Zinc stearate: purely a release agent, irrelevant to slurry cost or quality trade-offs.
- Stearic acid: a wax-pattern additive, also irrelevant to the slurry binder choice.
- Both Ethyl and Sodium silicate: ethyl silicate is alcohol based, more expensive, but gives finer surface detail and dimensional accuracy, making it the preferred choice for the prime coats closest to the pattern. Sodium silicate is water based, much cheaper, and gives adequate strength for the thicker backup coats where fine detail no longer matters. Combining both lets a foundry get precision where it counts and save cost where it doesn't.
- Neither Ethyl nor Sodium silicate: this ignores the well-established cost-quality trade-off that leads foundries to use both silicates together.
The practical cost-versus-precision trade-off in shell building is exactly why both binders are used together.
Therefore, the correct answer is Both Ethyl and Sodium silicate.