Step 1: State the general rule for a sum of $n$ equally precise, independent measurements.
In surveying error theory, if a quantity is obtained by adding $n$ independently measured parts, each with the same precision $\sigma$, the precision (standard error) of the sum follows the general relation $\sigma_{\text{sum}} = \sigma\sqrt{n}$, which comes directly from adding variances (not standard deviations) for independent errors.
Step 2: Verify this rule with a small case first.
For $n = 1$ section, the precision of the sum is trivially just $\sigma$, and $\sigma\sqrt{1} = \sigma$, consistent. For $n = 4$ equal sections, doubling from 1 to 4 should scale the standard error by $\sqrt{4} = 2$, not by 4, because variances (not standard deviations) add: $\sigma_{\text{sum}}^2 = 4\sigma^2 \Rightarrow \sigma_{\text{sum}} = 2\sigma$. This confirms the square-root scaling.
Step 3: Apply the verified rule to $n = 10$.
\[ \sigma_L = \sigma\sqrt{n} = \sigma\sqrt{10} \]
Step 4: Cross-check numerically.
Suppose $\sigma = 0.01$ m per section. Then $\sigma_L = 0.01 \times \sqrt{10} \approx 0.01 \times 3.162 = 0.0316$ m. This is larger than a single section's precision (as it must be, since more measurements are combined) but far smaller than $10\sigma = 0.10$ m, which would be the result of naively adding standard deviations as if the errors were fully correlated.
Step 5: Confirm option (A) matches.
This numeric check matches option (A), \(\sigma\sqrt{10}\), and rules out (C) $10\sigma$ as an overestimate and (B), (D) as expressions for the mean's precision rather than the sum's.
Step 6: Conclude.
\[ \sigma_L = \boxed{\sigma\sqrt{10}} \]