A significant increase from \(O_2^–\) to \(Al^{3+}\)
A significant decrease from \(O_2^–\) to \(Al^{3+}\)
An increase from \(O_2^–\) to \(F^–\) and then decrease from \(Na^+\) to \(Al^{3+}\)
The ions \(O_2^–\), \(F^–\), \(Na^+\), \(Mg^{2+}\), and \(Al^{3+}\) are all isoelectronic, meaning they have the same number of electrons. They each have 10 electrons because the electronic configuration of each is that of neon, \([\text{Ne}]\). However, they have different nuclear charges (number of protons), which affects their ionic sizes.
The ionic radius is influenced by the effective nuclear charge. The more positive the charge on the ion, the smaller its radius because the electrons are held more tightly by the increased nuclear charge. Conversely, a more negative charge means fewer protons for the same number of electrons, resulting in a larger ionic radius due to less effective nuclear attraction.
Let's look at each ion:
Therefore, as we move from \(O_2^–\) to \(Al^{3+}\), the effective nuclear charge increases leading to a significant decrease in ionic radius. The trend is of decreasing ionic size: \(O_2^– > F^– > Na^+ > Mg^{2+} > Al^{3+}\).
Hence, the correct answer is:
A significant decrease from \(O_2^–\) to \(Al^{3+}\).