
Alternative — apply the standard 3×3 combined-ring second-vertical-derivative template directly in one step (this is algebraically the same result as the two-step Richardson extrapolation above, just packaged as a single operator, the way it is usually quoted in gravity-interpretation texts):
\[ (g_{xx}+g_{yy})=\dfrac{1}{s^2}\Big[2\,\Sigma(\text{Ring1})-\tfrac12\,\Sigma(\text{Ring2})-6P\Big] \]
Plug in the numbers (\(s=1\) km):
\(2\times30.99=61.98\)
\(0.5\times30.94=15.47\)
\(6\times7.78=46.68\)
\[ (g_{xx}+g_{yy})=61.98-15.47-46.68=-0.17 \]
By Laplace's equation, \(g_{zz}=-(g_{xx}+g_{yy})=0.17\ \text{mGal/km}^2\), reproducing the two-step result in a single line and confirming the value sits inside 0.16–0.18 mGal/km\(^2\).