Question:medium

The famous isolation vs. integration debate of the 1940s relating to tribal societies was primarily a debate between :

Show Hint

For debates and historical policy discussions, focus on the core ideological differences. The 1940s tribal debate was fundamentally about the extent of separation versus inclusion of tribal communities within the larger Indian polity.
Updated On: May 30, 2026
  • Integrationists & Assimilationists
  • Isolationists & Integrationists
  • Modernists & Traditionalists
  • Secularists & Religionists
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The Tribal Policy in pre-independence and early post-independence India was divided into two main schools of thought regarding the future of tribal communities.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
1. Isolationists (The "National Park" approach): Led by thinkers like Verrier Elwin. They argued that tribes should be isolated to protect them from exploitation by outsiders and to preserve their unique culture.
2. Integrationists: Led by sociologists like G.S. Ghurye. They argued that tribals were essentially "backward Hindus" and should be integrated into mainstream society and economic processes to improve their standard of living.
3. This debate helped shape India's tribal policy, which eventually aimed for a middle path (integration without total assimilation).
Step 3: Final Answer:
The debate was primarily between Isolationists and Integrationists.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Tribal Development


Questions Asked in CUET (UG) exam