The Dining Philosopher problem can be solved by:
Show Hint
- Use of semaphores
- Use of overlays
- Mutual exclusion
- Bounded waiting
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Define the Dining Philosopher Problem.
The Dining Philosopher problem illustrates a synchronization challenge where multiple philosophers share resources (like forks). The goal is to prevent deadlock and ensure fair access for eating.
Step 2: Explain Semaphore Usage.
Semaphores are OS synchronization tools. For the Dining Philosopher problem, they control fork access, ensuring only one philosopher uses a fork at a time, thus preventing deadlock and enforcing mutual exclusion.
Step 3: Evaluate Alternative Options.
- (2) Overlays: A memory management technique, irrelevant to this problem.
- (3) Mutual exclusion: Essential for deadlock prevention, but semaphores are the specific mechanism used here.
- (4) Bounded waiting: Guarantees no indefinite waiting but isn't the core solution.
Step 4: State the Conclusion.
The correct solution is (1) Use of semaphores, which enables safe fork acquisition and release, thereby avoiding deadlock.
Top Questions on Synchronization
- Consider a typical process P in the critical section. Arrange the following statements of code to make a valid general structure.
(A). Critical section
(B). Remainder section
(C). Entry section
(D). Exit section- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Computer Science
- Synchronization
Consider the following threads, T1, T2, and T3 executing on a single processor, synchronized using three binary semaphore variables, S1, S2, and S3, operated upon using standard wait() and signal(). The threads can be context switched in any order and at any time.
- GATE CS - 2022
- Operating System
- Synchronization
Consider the following multi-threaded code segment (in a mix of C and pseudo-code), invoked by two processes $P1$ and $P2$, and each of the processes spawns two threads $T1$ and $T2$:
int x = 0; // global Lock L1; // global main() { create a thread to execute foo(); // Thread T1 create a thread to execute foo(); // Thread T2 wait for the two threads to finish execution; print(x); } foo() { int y = 0; Acquire L1; x = x + 1; y = y + 1; Release L1; print(y); }Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
- GATE CS - 2021
- Operating System
- Synchronization
- Want to practice more? Try solving extra ecology questions todayView All Questions