Step 1: Understanding earthquake-resistant design.
Earthquake-resistant design aims for ductile structural behavior, prioritizing life safety. The intended failure mechanism involves plastic hinges forming in beams, not columns, to prevent collapse.
Step 2: Strong Column – Weak Beam Concept.
This principle dictates that columns should be stronger than beams. Consequently, plastic hinges will develop in the beams, allowing for load redistribution and energy dissipation without immediate structural failure.
Step 3: Rationale for design choice.
- (A) Weak column – Strong beam: This configuration leads to column failure and catastrophic collapse, which is undesirable.
- (C) Strong column – Strong beam: This approach is neither practical nor economical in design.
- (D) Weak column – Weak beam: This scenario presents a significant safety hazard.
Step 4: Conclusion.
The optimal design philosophy for earthquake resistance is therefore the Strong column – Weak beam approach.
Sequentially arrange the reactions of observers and type of damage during an earthquake in the increasing order of earthquake intensity measured at Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale.
A. Earthquake is felt quite noticeably indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Damage: No damage. Standing motor cars may rock slightly.
B. Everyone runs outdoors. Noticed by persons driving motor cars. Damage: Considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures.
C. Earthquake is not felt except by a few people under especially favorable circumstances. Damage: No damage.
D. Earthquake is felt by nearly everyone, many awakened. Damage: Some dishes, windows broken, few cracks in plaster, unstable objects overturned.
