To resolve this issue, we must examine the provided assertions and identify which deductions are logically sound.
- Assertions: Established facts serving as the basis for deductions.
- Deductions: Inferences derived logically from the assertions.
- Employ set theory and logical principles for validity assessment.
- Every feline is a canine.
- A subset of canines are avian creatures.
- Deduction I: A subset of felines are avian creatures.
Given that all felines are canines and only a portion of canines are avian, it is not possible to infer that some felines are avian. Consequently, Deduction I lacks logical support.
- Deduction II: A subset of canines are felines.
Since all felines are canines, it logically follows that some canines are indeed felines. Thus, Deduction II is valid.
Only Deduction II is valid.