Step 1: Recognise \( u \) and \( v \) as polar-type coordinates.
Notice \( u = x^2+y^2 = r^2 \) and \( v = \tan^{-1}(y/x) = \theta \), where \( r,\theta \) are the usual polar coordinates. So really we are asking whether \( (r^2, \theta) \) are independent functions of \( x, y \), which should hold everywhere except the origin, since polar coordinates form a genuine, invertible coordinate system there.
Step 2: Use the chain rule to split the Jacobian.
Since \( u,v \) depend on \( x,y \) through \( r,\theta \), we can write
\[
\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)} = \frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(r,\theta)} \cdot \frac{\partial(r,\theta)}{\partial(x,y)}
\]
The first factor is easy since \( u = r^2 \) and \( v = \theta \):
\[
\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(r,\theta)} = \begin{vmatrix} 2r & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{vmatrix} = 2r
\]
Step 3: Use the known polar Jacobian.
The standard result \( \frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(r,\theta)} = r \) gives its inverse directly:
\[
\frac{\partial(r,\theta)}{\partial(x,y)} = \frac{1}{r}
\]
Multiplying the two factors:
\[
\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)} = 2r \cdot \frac{1}{r} = 2
\]
This is non-zero everywhere except at the origin, so Statement-II is true, and a non-zero Jacobian means \( u, v \) are functionally independent, so Statement-I is true as well. Both statements hold, matching option (C).