Question

Statement 1: The Evidence Law helps the judges to separate the ‘Wheat from the Chaff’.
Statement 2: The function of the law of evidence is to provide a mechanism for the investigation and trial of offenders.

• A. Both statements are correct.
• B. Both statements are incorrect.
• C. Statement 1 is correct, but Statement 2 is not correct.
• D. Statement 2 is correct, but Statement 1 is not correct.

Hint:

Evidence law governs admissibility and evaluation of evidence in court but does not handle the investigation or trial procedures.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

The law of evidence functions to enable judges and courts to differentiate between pertinent and extraneous facts, or accurate and fabricated evidence—in essence, to separate the ‘Wheat from the Chaff’. This facilitates equitable and impartial judgments in legal proceedings.
Nonetheless, the law of evidence does not dictate the methods for investigating or trying offenders. Instead, it prescribes the rules for evidence admissibility during a trial to establish or refute facts.
Statement 1: Correct — Evidence law assists judges in discerning reliable facts.
Statement 2: Incorrect — Investigation and trial processes are governed by procedural laws, not evidence law.
Consequently, option (C) is the accurate selection.