Note: the question does not give the old profit-sharing ratio, so Ramesh and Sohan are taken to share profits equally.
Step 1: Verify the new ratio using an alternate route — add up the new shares directly:
Ramesh's new share = old share − sacrifice = 4/8 − 1/8 = 3/8; Sohan's new share = 4/8 − 1/8 = 3/8; Aman's share = 2/8. Sum = 3/8+3/8+2/8 = 8/8 = 1, confirming the shares are consistent.
Step 2: Treat the transaction as two separate cash receipts merged into one bank entry, then split them out for clarity:
Capital portion: Bank A/c Dr. 30,000, To Aman's Capital A/c 30,000.
Goodwill portion actually received: Bank A/c Dr. 24,000, To Premium for Goodwill A/c 24,000.
(These are shown as a single combined Bank Dr. of 54,000 in practice, but separating them here shows the logic clearly.)
Step 3: Handle the shortfall by treating Aman as still owing the firm:
Since Aman still owes Rs. 16,000 of goodwill, this is a personal debt he owes the firm — recorded by debiting HIS Current Account (not Capital, since Current Account is used for such running adjustments) and crediting Premium for Goodwill A/c with the same Rs. 16,000, so the goodwill account is fully populated at Rs. 40,000 either way.
Step 4: Distribute the full Rs. 40,000 goodwill to old partners by sacrifice, and cross-check the capital totals:
Ramesh's Capital: 40,000 (opening) + 20,000 (goodwill share) = Rs. 60,000.
Sohan's Capital: 60,000 (opening) + 20,000 (goodwill share) = Rs. 80,000.
Aman's Capital: Rs. 30,000 (capital only; his goodwill dues sit in his Current A/c, not Capital A/c).
Final Answer:
Ramesh's Capital = Rs. 60,000, Sohan's Capital = Rs. 80,000, Aman's Capital = Rs. 30,000, and Aman's Current Account carries a debit balance of \[ \boxed{Rs.\ 16{,}000} \], representing the goodwill he still owes the firm.