Question:easy

Passage:

Archaeology is a source of history, not just a humble auxiliary discipline. Archaeological data are historical documents in their own right, not mere illustrations to written texts. Just as much as any other historian, an archaeologist studies and tries to reconstitute the process that has created the human world in which we live and us ourselves in so far as we are each creatures of our age and social environment. Archaeological data are all changes in the material world resulting from human action, or more succinctly, the fossilized results of human behavior. The sum total of these constitutes what may be called the archaeological record. This record exhibits certain peculiarities and deficiencies, the consequences of which produce a rather superficial contrast between archaeological history and the more familiar kind based upon written records.

Not all human behavior fossilizes. The words I utter and you hear as vibrations in the air are certainly human changes in the material world and may be of great historical significance. Yet they leave no sort of trace in the archaeological records unless they are captured by a dictaphone or written down by a clerk. The movement of troops on the battlefield may "change the course of history", but this is equally ephemeral from the archaeologist's standpoint. What is perhaps worse is most organic materials are perishable. Everything made of wood, hide, wool, linen, grass, hair and similar materials will decay and vanish in dust in a few years or centuries save under very exceptional conditions. In a relatively brief period the archaeological record is reduced to mere scraps of stone, bone, glass, metal, and earthenware. Still, modern archaeology, by applying appropriate techniques and comparative methods, aided by a few lucky finds from peat bogs, deserts and frozen soils, is able to fill up a good deal of the gap.

The purpose of archaeology is to learn more about past societies and the development of the human race. Over 99% of the development of humanity has occurred within prehistoric cultures, which did not make use of writing, thereby not leaving written records of themselves that can be studied today. Without such written sources, the only way to learn about prehistoric societies is to use archaeology. Many important developments in human history occurred during prehistory, such as the evolution of humanity during the Paleolithic period, when the hominins developed from the australopithecines in Africa and eventually into modern Homo sapiens. Archaeology also sheds light on many of humanity's technological advances, for instance the ability to use fire, the development of stone tools, the discovery of metallurgy, the beginnings of religion, and the creation of agriculture. Without archaeology, we would know little or nothing about the use of material culture by humanity that pre-dates writing.

However, it is not only prehistoric, pre-literate cultures that can be studied using archaeology but historic, literate cultures as well, through the sub-discipline of historical archaeology. For many literate cultures, such as Ancient Greece and Mesopotamia, their surviving records are often incomplete and biased to some extent. In many societies, literacy was restricted to the elite classes, such as the clergy or the bureaucracy of court or temple. The literacy even of aristocrats has sometimes been restricted to deeds and contracts. The interests and world-view of elites are often quite different from the lives and interests of the populace. Writings that were produced by people more representative of the general population were unlikely to find their way into libraries and be preserved there for posterity. Thus, written records tend to reflect the biases, assumptions, cultural values and possibly deceptions of a limited range of individuals, usually a small fraction of the larger population. Hence, written records cannot be trusted as a sole source. The material record may be closer to a fair representation of society, though it is subject to its own biases, such as sampling bias and differential preservation.
Question:
'Yet they leave no sort of trace in the archaeological records unless they are captured by a dictaphone or written down by a clerk'. The word 'they' in this sentence refers to

Show Hint

Look at the sentence right before this one; find the plural noun that the pronoun logically replaces.
Updated On: Jul 20, 2026
  • Scraps
  • Words
  • Troops
  • Humans
  • Animals
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Pronoun-reference questions are solved by substitution: replace "they" with each candidate noun and check whether the sentence still makes sense in context. The full context is: "The words I utter and you hear as vibrations in the air are certainly human changes in the material world... Yet they leave no sort of trace in the archaeological records unless they are captured by a dictaphone or written down by a clerk." Substitute "words": "Yet words leave no trace unless captured by a dictaphone or written down by a clerk", this reads perfectly, since a dictaphone records sound (spoken words) and a clerk writes down what is said (words again). Now try "troops": troops are not "captured by a dictaphone," so that substitution fails; troops belong to the very next sentence about battlefields, a different example entirely. "Scraps" belongs to a different paragraph about surviving materials like stone and bone. "Humans" and "Animals" were never introduced as the subject in this part of the passage. Only "words" fits both the grammar (plural noun immediately before the pronoun) and the meaning (something that can be recorded by a dictaphone or written down). So the answer is option (b), Words.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Questions Asked in IBSAT exam