Understanding the Concept:
We need a fact that really applies to the painting. A good method is to list what we can see in the image and then check which option describes it.
Step 1: What we see:
The picture has no clear human figure and no single viewpoint. It has sharp triangular and diamond-like planes, arches and towers, and light that seems to shine from inside the buildings.
Step 2: Which art style matches:
Planes that cut across each other and show many sides at once are the mark of Cubism. In India, Gaganendranath Tagore used this idea in his own way.
Step 3: Remove the other options:
Folk art (option 1) is flat and decorative, which does not match. Calligraphic line (option 3) needs long free strokes, which are missing. A Tantric visual sense (option 4) belongs to a later movement and usually uses symbols and geometry of rituals.
Step 4: Conclude:
Option 2 is the only statement that agrees with what we see and with the painter's known style.
Final Answer:
Option 2 is correct. \[ \boxed{\text{Cubism syntax}} \]